[Spellyans] Late Cornish adaptations

[Michael Everson]

On 1 Aug 2008, at 17:01, Daniel Prohaska wrote:

> But <owna> is attested? Why should we not allow it alongside <ewna>.  
> We have the same Vocalic Alternation between <ewn> ~ <owna> as we  
> have with <bew> ~ <bownans>. These alternatives should not be  
> discouraged in my opinion but allowed as legitimate variants.

I think Nicholas is saying he prefers to use <owna> for 'fear' and  
<ewna> for 'emend'. Similarly, he uses the <bës> form of all  
<bÿs>~<bës> words, except for <ÿs> 'corn'.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://kernowek.net/pipermail/spellyans_kernowek.net/attachments/20080801/92d249d9/attachment.htm>