[Spellyans] Late Cornish adaptations
everson at evertype.com
Fri Aug 1 16:12:48 IST 2008
On 1 Aug 2008, at 17:01, Daniel Prohaska wrote:
> But <owna> is attested? Why should we not allow it alongside <ewna>.
> We have the same Vocalic Alternation between <ewn> ~ <owna> as we
> have with <bew> ~ <bownans>. These alternatives should not be
> discouraged in my opinion but allowed as legitimate variants.
I think Nicholas is saying he prefers to use <owna> for 'fear' and
<ewna> for 'emend'. Similarly, he uses the <bës> form of all
<bÿs>~<bës> words, except for <ÿs> 'corn'.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Spellyans