[Spellyans] emendations to the SWF

[nicholas williams]

Emendations to the SWF specification.
4 says budhi ~ beudhi is to become beudhi only.
9 on the other hand says the alternation euthek ~ uthik is to be
replaced by euthek ~ ithik.

Clearly ithik is based on Lhuyd’s ithik. But if we aren’t allowed
budhi/budhy we are ignoring Lhuyd’s bidhis ‘drowned’ in Rag oun hui  
dho Kodha po an Reu dho derhi, a huei dho voz bidhis Least you fall,  
or the ice break and you be drown’d AB: 250a.

It seems that these emendations, like the specification itself,
are incoherent.

Nicholas

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://kernowek.net/pipermail/spellyans_kernowek.net/attachments/20081211/c8f23036/attachment.htm>