[Spellyans] <kk> and <ck>

Michael Everson everson at evertype.com
Thu Dec 18 11:35:36 GMT 2008

On 18 Dec 2008, at 11:24, Daniel Prohaska wrote:

> I see your point, and potential *klokk makes it very convincing. So  
> you’d say <kk> in subjunctives and comparatives/superlatives and  
> <ck> everywhere else. I think I could live with that. I was thinking  
> of practicability and application for the non-linguist. SWF/M <kk> ~  
> SWF/T <ck> just seemed simple and manageable.

Within the paradigms, we have roots in -g which devoice; using -kka  
and -ksa seems to me easier than -cka and -ksa.

Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com

More information about the Spellyans mailing list