[Spellyans] Porth

[Michael Everson]

At 13:01 +0100 2008-07-26, Ken MacKinnon wrote:
>OK shall do.  However, I have always felt that comment on the previous iteme
>of correspondence enables readers to understand what you are talking about.
>'Netiquette' prevents that possibility .

You should include only the part of what people are talking about 
that you are responding you.

Note here, for example that I cut all of the previous material, 
though in your last one it was all there, uncut.

I see your e-mail client has been set to include previous postings 
BELOW your message. Perhaps you can re-set that; then it will be 
easier to cut what you don't need to cite.

Thanks for your consideration. Same goes for everyone.
-- 
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com