[Spellyans] -ita

nicholas williams njawilliams at gmail.com
Tue Jul 1 11:36:39 IST 2008


incressya/yncressya is not attested. That seems to me like good reason.

On 1 Jul 2008, at 11:09, Michael Everson wrote:

> At 09:53 +0100 2008-07-01, nicholas williams wrote:
>> I prefer encressya to incressya. <encressya> forms occur twice,
>> <incressya> twice. *yncressya appears to be unattested.
>> cressya is much commoner than either:  x 9.
>
> If we are going to have some of these loanwords in in- and some of
> them in en- we had better have good reason. We need consistency here.
> Also to assist us in assimilating new loanwords.
> -- 
> Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spellyans mailing list
> Spellyans at kernowek.net
> http://kernowek.net/mailman/listinfo/spellyans_kernowek.net





More information about the Spellyans mailing list