[Spellyans] SWF vowel inconsistencies

Owen Cook owen.e.cook at gmail.com
Wed Jul 2 17:37:06 IST 2008


Interesting ideas. <v> as a vowel certainly has an impeccable
pedigree, but modern folk have become unaccustomed to it. Is <ui> much
attested where we expect /u:/?

~~Owen

2008/7/2 A. J. Trim <ajtrim at msn.com> rug scrifa:
> They could be written:
>
> fruit [fru:t], lvk "luck" and Luik "Luke".
>
> No diacritics; no problem.
>
> That's <ui> for <û> and <v> for <ù>.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Andrew J. Trim




More information about the Spellyans mailing list