[Spellyans] SWF vowel inconsistencies
owen.e.cook at gmail.com
Wed Jul 2 17:37:06 IST 2008
Interesting ideas. <v> as a vowel certainly has an impeccable
pedigree, but modern folk have become unaccustomed to it. Is <ui> much
attested where we expect /u:/?
2008/7/2 A. J. Trim <ajtrim at msn.com> rug scrifa:
> They could be written:
> fruit [fru:t], lvk "luck" and Luik "Luke".
> No diacritics; no problem.
> That's <ui> for <û> and <v> for <ù>.
> Andrew J. Trim
More information about the Spellyans