[Spellyans] More on bys/bes words and diacritical marks
eddie_climo at yahoo.co.uk
Thu Jul 10 07:44:26 IST 2008
On 9 Jul 2008, at 21:49, A. J. Trim wrote:
> I know that we have covered this topic previously but some further
> discussion is required.
> I assume that we want to write bÿs/bës & bys in KS because the SWF
> has bys/bes & bys, and we consider that to be “broken”, i.e. a poor
> feature of the SWF.
> Firstly, this is because bys [bi:z]~[be:z] “world” or “finger”
> could also mean [biz] “until”, so we should like to spell them
> differently from each other.
> However, Mary said, “I don't think I've ever muddled up these
> words, I don't know the clever way to say it, but they're just not
> words you confuse, they don't come in the same places if you follow
We might learn a useful lesson from Scots Gaelic, and the official
spelling reforms introduced a couple of decades ago. Under the new
spelling, two words that used to spelt differently are now spelt the
gu'n > gun (='to the')
gun > gun (without)
One of the other changes was the replacement of the grave accent by
the acute, even though <e> and <o> (the only 2 letters affected by
this measure). This simplification was recommended despite 2 facts:
(1) a few words would no longer be distinguished in writing by their
)2) the two accents each denoted a slightly different sound in the
speech of many native speakers.
The moral is that this Gaelic has gone for a simpler notational
system which encodes less information, rather than a more detailed,
complex and discriminating one.
Perhaps we should follow the same path, and not try over hard to
notate too much in KS
Eddie Foirbeis Climo
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ahes an forth hyr hep wothvos y tremenynyn.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Spellyans