[Spellyans] More on bys/bes words and diacritical marks

Tom Trethewey tom.trethewey at yahoo.co.uk
Thu Jul 10 14:24:30 IST 2008


--- On Thu, 10/7/08, Jon Mills <j.mills at email.com> wrote:

>If the vowel were [I], as you suggest, Tom,  then why was it sometimes written <e>? 
 
I am using [I] to label a vowel which lay between [i] and [E].  Perhaps I should have used /e/, since the phonemic notation absolves one of the need to specify realizations. 
 
>Surely [I] would have been written <i> or <y>. 
 
Not necessarily.  The scribes were not trained phoneticians.
 
>For the vowel to be sometimes written <e>, the vowel would have to be even lower than [I], but not as low as [e]. 
 
Perhaps it was.  The point is it was phonemically distinct from /i/ and /E/.
 
>What might perhaps be more plausible is a phoneme /I_o/ with allophones [I] and [e].
 
Such a phoneme is more conveniently labelled /I/.
 
Tom





      __________________________________________________________
Not happy with your email address?.
Get the one you really want - millions of new email addresses available now at Yahoo! http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/ymail/new.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://kernowek.net/pipermail/spellyans_kernowek.net/attachments/20080710/342f4bad/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Spellyans mailing list