[Spellyans] More on bys/bes words and diacritical marks
njawilliams at gmail.com
Thu Jul 10 17:04:11 IST 2008
The argument that a phoneme is midway between Y and Z and is
therefore written X is not one that carries much weight.
If there is a phoneme X then the scribes will tend to spell it by the
closest graph available. They may
write two different sounds in the same way, e.g. <u> for /oe/ and /y/
in Middle Cornish. But the idea that
<e> and <i> mean something in between both is naive. Ken George
noticed the hesitation between
s and g and suggested the absurd /tj/ and /dj/. The most likely
explanation is that both /dZ/ and /z/ occurred and this seems
to be the case in Late Cornish and in toponyms.
If there had been a sound *[dj] the scribes would have devised a
combination of letters to write it.
Res 'necessity' is indeed written rys and ris. Just as 'given' is
reys, rys, ris and res. <res> is much commoner for 'necessity' than
There are several problems here. One is that the scribes learnt to
write rys for 'given', but may have said res. As a result there was
confusion between <e> and <i> in long stressed syllables. This is
probably the cause of dith in Tregear. Lhuyd gives dêdh as the only
My own view is that some words had variant pronunciations, e.g. bys
'world' was eith bi:z or be:z. I do not believe that Middle Cornish
had i: I: and e:. Such a threefold opposition would be unique in
Brythonic and inherently unstable
On 10 Jul 2008, at 16:36, Tom Trethewey wrote:
> --- On Thu, 10/7/08, Michael Everson <everson at evertype.com> wrote:
> <res> necessary is never *<rys>.
> I understand that you have a data-base of spellings in the texts,
> Please consult it.
> Not happy with your email address?
> Get the one you really want - millions of new email addresses
> available now at Yahoo!_______________________________________________
> Spellyans mailing list
> Spellyans at kernowek.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Spellyans