[Spellyans] redistribution of <i> and <y>
njawilliams at gmail.com
Thu Jul 24 16:02:45 IST 2008
Bennozh and bennigañ, although related, are different words.
The first is from Latin benedictio via *ben'dict-
the second is from benedico via *ben'dic.
On 24 Jul 2008, at 14:54, Koumanonff wrote:
> In Breton we have :
> nevez > neveziñ
> mallozh ['malOs] or ['mal at s] > mallozhiñ [ma'lO:zi~]
> bennozh ['bEnOs] or ['bEn at s] > bennigañ, bennizhien
> > Message du 24/07/08 12:03
> > De : "Michael Everson"
> > A : "Standard Cornish discussion list"
> > Copie à :
> > Objet : Re: [Spellyans] redistribution of and
> > At 10:39 +0100 2008-07-24, nicholas williams wrote:
> > >If I understand him, Lhuyd seems to be saying that the historic -ys
> > >is either [Ez], [Iz] or [aZ]
> > >and it does not seem possible to see why one is used rather than
> > >of the others.
> > >Since the -ek ending in Late Cornish is either -ak or -ok, it would
> > >seem that reduced -ek can
> > >acquire u-colouring.
> > We find the same thing in English dialect. "Wicket" in New Zealand
> > pronounced as though it were what we would write "weckut".
> > >There are problems with you suggested spellings. The form
> > >is attested seven times. The plural
> > >of bedneth, baneth is and of molleth . Are
> > >you therefore
> > >suggesting that we write *, * and *?
> > Here would fall *tavos/tavosow. But for this word I don't see a
> > strong case for the retention of -es (etymologically expected or
> > not). Perhaps the final -th "protects" the -e- in noweth, bedneth,
> > molleth?
> > --
> > Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com
> > _______________________________________________
> > Spellyans mailing list
> > Spellyans at kernowek.net
> > http://kernowek.net/mailman/listinfo/spellyans_kernowek.net
> Spellyans mailing list
> Spellyans at kernowek.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Spellyans