[Spellyans] <y>, <i>, etc

Craig Weatherhill weatherhill at freenet.co.uk
Fri Jul 25 11:24:09 IST 2008


I think that explains it rather well.

Craig


Eddie Climo wrote:
> On 25 Jul 2008, at 01:18, A. J. Trim wrote:
>> . . ..
>>
>> I am not convinced that *yn* “in” is really any different from *yn* 
>> /adverbial particle/. I think they are the same word, so they should 
>> be spelt the same way. The adverbial use is some kind of an idiom 
>> using “in”. This mutates adjectives but not nouns, so *yn gwir* “in 
>> truth” is not mutated but *yn ta* “well” is.
>>
> Agreed.
>
> Eddie Foirbeis Climo
> - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- -
> Dres ethom akennow byner re bons lyeshes
> /Accenti non multiplicanda praeter necessitatem/
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spellyans mailing list
> Spellyans at kernowek.net
> http://kernowek.net/mailman/listinfo/spellyans_kernowek.net
>   





More information about the Spellyans mailing list