[Spellyans] off-topic - Drok yu genef!

A. J. Trim ajtrim at msn.com
Fri Jul 25 18:03:31 IST 2008

Is that what we have now?


Andrew J. Trim

From: Eddie Climo 
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 3:38 PM
To: Standard Cornish discussion list 
Subject: Re: [Spellyans] off-topic - Drok yu genef!

On 25 Jul 2008, at 14:56, A. J. Trim wrote:
  . . .. Actually, there is a smidgen of confusion in English. The term “inflammable” has had to be re-spelt “flammable” for safety reasons!

To be precise, it was for *alleged* safety reasons. 'Inflammable' was on reagents bottles in Chemistry labs when I was at school, and I don't recall ever hearing of even the dimmest students barbecuing themselves by mis-parsing the word. The opposite then was 'non-inflammable', which is pretty unambiguous as well. 

But what have we moved to now, I wonder? Logically, if we believe the horror stories of those who advocated the change, it should have become:

But according to my recent OED, it's actually:

Furthermore, the medical profession didn't feel the need to start talking about "flammation of a wound", did they? And have you ever heard reference to a 'flammatory remark'? Hah!

No, it was just the fledgling Health & Safety Industry trying to find solutions to non-existent problems, to give themselves something to do.

'in lel'? 'yn lel'? 'idn lel'?


Eddie Foirbeis Climo
- -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- -
Dres ethom akennow byner re bons lyeshes
Accenti non multiplicanda praeter necessitatem


Spellyans mailing list
Spellyans at kernowek.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://kernowek.net/pipermail/spellyans_kernowek.net/attachments/20080725/cac3db39/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the Spellyans mailing list