[Spellyans] dydh, dedh, deidh

Michael Everson everson at evertype.com
Wed Jun 25 12:00:24 BST 2008

At 09:12 +0000 2008-06-25, Jon Mills wrote:
>However, apart from the initial <d->, these options do not bear much 
>resemblance to any traditional forms.

We aren't going to abandon <dh>. Please don't suggest that we do....
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com

More information about the Spellyans mailing list