[Spellyans] RLC <h> for <gh>

[Owen Cook]

No I can't, which is why I think it's really /e:T/. In any event,
<'eth> is better than <yeth>.

~~Owen

2008/6/25 nicholas williams <njawilliams at gmail.com>:
> We cannot be sure. Can you think of any parallel?
> Nicholas
> On 25 Jun 2008, at 18:52, Owen Cook wrote:
>
>> I think so too Nicholas, but can we be sure of this? Can we actually
>> exclude the possibility of /ejT/?
>>
>> ~~Owen