[Spellyans] SWF principles

[Terry Corbett]

I am also concerned with "principle 5. Since no one seems to have any
accurate facts regarding how many people use any of the different Cornish
orthographies how can this be evaluated? I should think that "pinciples" 3
and five should be removed.

On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 1:29 PM, Terry <teli7777 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Are the 5 principles of the SWF set in stone or are they open for
> discussion when the 5 year review occurs?These principles are listed as:
>
> 1. *Inclusivity *– Users of all varieties of Revived Cornish should be able
> to write as they speak.
> 2. *Accessibility *– The SWF should be as easy as possible for speakers,
> learners, and teachers to learn and use.
> 3. *Accuracy *– The SWF should reflect the pronunciation of both
> traditional and Revived Cornish.
> 4. *Authenticity *– The SWF should use spellings that reflect established
> traditions of Cornish orthography.
> 5. *Continuity *– Where practical, the SWF should produce the smallest
> possible number of changes for the largest possible number of speakers.
>
> Terry
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://kernowek.net/pipermail/spellyans_kernowek.net/attachments/20080627/feb8453c/attachment.htm>