[Spellyans] Front unrounded vowels, was: The quantity system

Owen Cook owen.e.cook at gmail.com
Tue Jun 24 12:48:42 IST 2008

2008/6/24 nicholas williams <njawilliams at gmail.com>:
> The next question is whether to accommodate three long hight front vowel i:
> I: and e: as is the case at present in
> the SWF specification. The SWF allows bI:z for 'world', for example, which
> nobody actually says.
> This matter involves the distribution of <i> and <y> (both for long and
> short vowels) and will need a lot of attention.
> Nicholas.

It does need a lot of attention. I suspect this will be the main topic
of contention in our coming discussions.

The variable (I:) was, if nothing else, a useful fiction at an earlier
stage of KS, when we wrote <ei> to indicate alternations between /i:/
and /e:/ in words like 'deidh' and 'preis'. This compromise was
abandoned in the SWF, however, which allows users to choose between
'dydh' or 'dedh', 'prys' or 'pres'.

So now there is a problem in the SWF for Middle Cornish, where <y>
normally indicates the short vowel /I/, but, because of the rejection
of <ei>, is also pressed into service for the long vowel in 'dydh' and
'prys' (which is theoretically /I:/ for Kemmyn users, and in practice
/i:/ for revived Middle Cornish users generally).

The latest incarnation of KS uses <ÿ> to indicate this long y,
alternating with /e:/. Again (I:) here appears as a distinct variable.
But there's something really incoherent about requiring the special
character <ë> in 'dedh' and 'pres', as the latest version of KS does.
Either we should allow alternation, by which <ÿ> and <e> can coexist
(and remember, here we need the accent on <ÿ> to show length) ... or
else we should use an umbrella graph to cover both alternants, for
example <ei> or <ë>. If <ë> were used as an umbrella graph by
everybody, well and good. But I fail to see any point in having <ë>
alternate with <ÿ>.

My own opinion is that for a SINGLE written form, umbrella graphs
should be preferred to alternation wherever practical. In that sense,
(I:) has its uses and could still be accommodated. I argued for <ei>
last summer, and my feelings have not changed. True, <ei> has been
shanghaied into use for the diphthong in 'kei', 'chei', 'crei', but
this is found in a different environment (open syllables only) and we
shall no doubt have reason to discuss whether it is necessary or
useful for such words in the first place.


More information about the Spellyans mailing list