[Spellyans] Front unrounded vowels, was: The quantity system
everson at evertype.com
Tue Jun 24 22:51:50 IST 2008
At 22:33 +0100 2008-06-24, A. J. Trim wrote:
>I have looked at your sample text, as requested.
>I really don't like this use of the dieresis. I think that it makes the
>text look unauthentic.
It's not hard to get used to. It's a solution to
a problem. Without an umbrella graph (and we
don't have one) we need to distinguish bÿs/bës
words from bys and res words.
>It's not really "unobtrusive". If it were it just wouldn't work.
I remember not liking the look of <beis> too. I got used to it.
>However, if we must have the dieresis in our orthography, I have the
>1) It is easy to remember that <ÿ> is [i:]. It is less easy to remember that
><ÿ> is [e:].
You don't have to. If you say [i:] you should
write <ÿ>. If you say [e:] you should write <ë>.
But when you encounter a text written in the
other dialect, the diaeresis will ensure that you
know what word the writer intended.
>2) It is easy to remember that <ë> is [e:]. It is easy for English speakers
>to remember that <ë> is [i:].
Again, you're going to choose the dialect you
prefer to write. Those dots will become familiar,
and when you see the dots on the other vowel,
you'll recognize the word. (Trust me, I know a
fair bit about literacy and orthography.)
>3) I would maintain <ei> as an alternative for those who cannot or do not
>want to use diacritical marks.
We can't mandate that in KS. It would introduce
too great a change. (We will be doing other things
>4) <ei> is closer to <ë> than it is to <ÿ>, so I would favour <ë>.
You should favour whichever you pronounce. If you
say [di:D], write <dÿdh>. If you say [de:D],
>5) <ea> could be used, instead of <ei>, if the <ei> is politically
>unacceptable. This would give veadh, beas, deadh, preas ... just a thought.
It's too late for that. I'm sorry. We have to
interact with the SWF. The SWF isn't a total
disaster. It has problems that need fixing so
that it can be used and considered academically
suitable. Nice as <ei> or <ea> might be, we won
the bys/bes options.
(Remember, at one stage only bys was on offer;
<y> was going to be an umbrella graph for
[i:]~[e:] and <i> was going to be used everywhere
else. We fought hard against that -- it would
have been a massive change for everyone
(including KK users. It was a very bad idea.
Since we won the right to write bys or bes as we
pronounce, all we need to do is mark those so
they can be distinguished from words without an
bys [bIz] 'until'
bÿs [bi:z]~[be:z] 'world'
bës [bi:z]~[be:z] 'world'
res [re:z] 'necessary'
Really -- this will work. It will make texts easy
to read and to write and it will make teaching
easier and learning easier.
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com
More information about the Spellyans