[Spellyans] RLC <h> for <gh>
njawilliams at gmail.com
Thu Jun 26 16:39:41 IST 2008
And since he was writing Late Cornish he more often than not
did not lenite initial consonants. This meant that dhe dhos [to use
remains as dho doaz [or whatever]. This reduces the instances of
There are minimal pairs in Lhuyd that show the phonemic distinction
of /D/ and /T/.
Notice: rag tra vêth AB: 222 and ha uelkom ti a vêdh JCH § 15.
On 26 Jun 2008, at 16:16, Michael Everson wrote:
> At 14:52 +0000 2008-06-26, Jon Mills wrote:
>> I have so far been unable to find a minimal contrast pair for
>> Lhuyd's <dh> and <th>. This suggests that in 17th century Cornish,
>> [D] and [T] are allophones, not separate phonemes.
> I don't know that that'd be so. Lhuyd will have had interference from
> Welsh which may muddy the waters somewhat.
> Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com
> Spellyans mailing list
> Spellyans at kernowek.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Spellyans