[Spellyans] SWF principles

Terry Corbett teli7777 at gmail.com
Fri Jun 27 20:15:04 IST 2008


The wording you use should replace that in "principle" 3. Your wording makes
sense, the present wording doesn't.

Terry

On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 1:09 PM, Michael Everson <everson at evertype.com>
wrote:

> At 12:54 -0600 2008-06-27, Terry Corbett wrote:
> >I am also concerned with "principle 5. Since no one seems to have
> >any accurate facts regarding how many people use any of the
> >different Cornish orthographies how can this be evaluated? I should
> >think that "pinciples" 3 and five should be removed.
>
> See my previous message for a defence of Principle 3. (Though
> "traditional" is superfluous there. The dead are not using KS.)
>
> Principle 5 is what caused the Arbitrator to reject some of the
> suggestions we are discussing on this list.
> --
> Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spellyans mailing list
> Spellyans at kernowek.net
> http://kernowek.net/mailman/listinfo/spellyans_kernowek.net
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://kernowek.net/pipermail/spellyans_kernowek.net/attachments/20080627/4db47cbe/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Spellyans mailing list