everson at evertype.com
Mon Oct 20 20:09:52 IST 2008
On 21 Oct 2008, at 01:55, Tom Trethewey wrote:
> If duk was borrowed into Middle Cornish, then it would have been
If it did that it would have become [diːk] in Late Cornish.
> If duke was borrowed into Late Cornish, then it would have been
> Similar remarks apply to other words which may have been borrowed
> more than once at different periods, i.e. the differences reflect
> changes in English rather than Cornish.
We're to have an orthography that reflects both RMC and RLC, and <duk>
can only be read [dyːk]~[diːk] according to the rules.
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com
More information about the Spellyans