[Spellyans] SWF questionable wordforms

nicholas williams njawilliams at gmail.com
Wed Sep 17 09:51:28 IST 2008


<dewas> is attested ten times in the texts.

Nicholas

On 17 Sep 2008, at 09:34, Michael Everson wrote:

> On 17 Sep 2008, at 08:44, Jon Mills wrote:
>
>> Pascon agan Arluth: dewas, zewas
>> Ordinalia: dewes; dywes
>> Ton, Rad. (1504): dewes; deues; dewosou
>> Boorde (1555): dewas
>> We should write 'dewes'.
>
> To be more specific: There is NO reason to write "diwes" at all,  
> except that George reconstructed it thus.
>
> Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spellyans mailing list
> Spellyans at kernowek.net
> http://kernowek.net/mailman/listinfo/spellyans_kernowek.net

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://kernowek.net/pipermail/spellyans_kernowek.net/attachments/20080917/5670742e/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Spellyans mailing list