[Spellyans] SWF questionable wordforms

Daniel Prohaska daniel at ryan-prohaska.com
Wed Sep 17 13:43:24 IST 2008


By SWF rules we ought to write <faladow>, and since this is also attested
it's fine. I see no need to change it.

Dan 

 

  _____  

From: nicholas williams
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 10:49 AM



 

But note he also writes <faladov> at BM 812 & 1820 and faladov occurs at BK
20.

 

The spelling <falladow> occurs 25 times in the Ordinalia, BK and CW.

Jordan writes <falladowe> five times.

 

If we were going by attestation we would write <falladow> not <faladow>.

 

Nicholas

 

 

On 17 Sep 2008, at 08:49, Jon Mills wrote:





Ton, Rad. (1504): falladow; feladow

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://kernowek.net/pipermail/spellyans_kernowek.net/attachments/20080917/a17690b9/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Spellyans mailing list