[Spellyans] SWF questionable wordforms

nicholas williams njawilliams at gmail.com
Wed Sep 17 14:15:39 IST 2008


Yes, exactly. This also would explain why the expected ending -es < - 
ed of the third person imperative is -ens, -ans in the texts  
(although, of course, KG has "corrected" such forms as bedhens 'let  
him be' to bedhes).

Nicholas

On 17 Sep 2008, at 13:46, Daniel Prohaska wrote:

> Maybe. Quite possible. Maybe these are just spontaneous alternations  
> of noun suffixes that for the native speakers of the time would have  
> been /@s/ or /@ns/.
> Dan
>
> From: nicholas williams
> Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 12:47 PM
>
> Notice also mar myn ov descans servya BM 524.
>
> I wonder whether dyscas, descas is not simply a variant of descans;  
> cf. mernes for mernans 'death', and bewnes, bewnas, bownas, bounas  
> for bewnans 'life'.
>
> Nicholas
>
>
> On 17 Sep 2008, at 10:27, Jon Mills wrote:
>
>
> In the case of 'dyskas', we have no plural attested.
> Pascon agan Arluth: dyskas
> Ordinalia: deskes; dyskes; thescas; thyskes; tyskes
> However, one might posit a plural, '*descosow'.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spellyans mailing list
> Spellyans at kernowek.net
> http://kernowek.net/mailman/listinfo/spellyans_kernowek.net

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://kernowek.net/pipermail/spellyans_kernowek.net/attachments/20080917/fbe66a26/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Spellyans mailing list