daniel at ryan-prohaska.com
Tue Apr 7 13:16:00 IST 2009
Yes, I would like to know this, too. Weren't we promised the minutes of the
AHG meetings? Isn't there a video of it as well? Albert, who was there,
specifically mentions Andrew Climo being unhappy about Trond's ruling. I
have no reason to doubt Albert's word in this.
From: Craig Weatherhill
Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 1:22 PM
"Have Trond's rulings ever been written down and circulated? If not, then
they count for nothing and are merely hearsay. We cannot progress on such a
basis. Also, if they have not been officially recorded, why not?
On 7 Ebr 2009, at 12:11, nicholas williams wrote:
> KK as the basis? This is the first I have heard of such a ruling.
> The Commission's report said nothing of the kind.
> KD was to be the basis.
> On 6 Apr 2009, at 23:42, Michael Everson wrote:
>>> Now this is not in the spec but Trond's ruling was that the KK
>>> form is to be taken as the basis and if it is found linguistically
>>> faulty or inauthentic, or in violation of the SWF specification,
> Spellyans mailing list
> Spellyans at kernowek.net
Spellyans mailing list
Spellyans at kernowek.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Spellyans