[Spellyans] -ssy-
Nicholas Williams
njawilliams at gmail.com
Mon Dec 14 16:37:33 GMT 2009
Given that encressya is < incresco, we could spell it encrescya.
On 12/14/09, Craig Weatherhill <weatherhill at freenet.co.uk> wrote:
> OK, I see your point. A cautionary word never goes amiss, though.
>
> Craig
>
>
> On 14 Kev 2009, at 16:12, Michael Everson wrote:
>
>
> > On 14 Dec 2009, at 16:04, Craig Weatherhill wrote:
> >
> >
> > > The danger, as I see it, Michael, is to apply rules too rigidly to the
> language (which was one of my major objections to KK - not that there is any
> comparison, let me add. From my viewpoint, KK deprived the language of life
> and character: to use Peter Pool's description, robotic). We mustn't fall
> into the same trap. A few foibles and irregularities allow a language to
> breathe; to have vibrancy and life. Don't misunderstand me - KS hasn't got
> to anywhere near that stage. Basically, it's great (although I have one or
> two small misgivings) but we must be careful to ensure that we don;t go down
> the wrong path.
> > >
> >
> > My stars, Craig, this has nothing to do with rigidity. It has to do with
> the pronunciation of the graph <ssy> in some positions.
> >
> > Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Spellyans mailing list
> > Spellyans at kernowek.net
> >
> http://kernowek.net/mailman/listinfo/spellyans_kernowek.net
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spellyans mailing list
> Spellyans at kernowek.net
> http://kernowek.net/mailman/listinfo/spellyans_kernowek.net
>
More information about the Spellyans
mailing list