[Spellyans] i ~ y
everson at evertype.com
Tue Feb 3 15:32:41 GMT 2009
On 3 Feb 2009, at 14:01, Daniel Prohaska wrote:
> The SWF doesn’t, unfortunately, go by the attested spellings, but
> rather assumes a context conditioned variation of [ð] and [θ] in
> unstressed syllables where etymologically /ð/ is expected, i.e.
> British /d/ or intervocalic /j/. As far as I can recall this was an
> AHG decision and it is mentioned in the final specification.
More of a waffle than a decision.
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com
More information about the Spellyans