[Spellyans] i ~ y
j.mills at email.com
Wed Feb 4 16:39:15 GMT 2009
As I said, I agree that Late Cornish as attested by Lhuyd (1707) makes a
phonemic distinction between /θ/ and / ð/. However there seems to be
no direct evidence on way or the other with regard to Middle Cornish.Jon
----- Original Message -----
From: "nicholas williams"
To: "Standard Cornish discussion list"
Subject: Re: [Spellyans] i ~ y
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 16:14:57 +0000
Lhuyd writes: po kotha Lavar an Enez-ma 'or the older speech of this
island' AB: 222. He also writes hui dho Kodha 'that you fall' AB:
250a.It certainly looks as though Lhuyd distinguished intervocalic
[T] from intervocalic [D]. I cannot believe he was simply basing
himself on Welshin these items, since coth is not the Welsh for
'old', although cwyddo 'fall' is common.So we have a minimal pair
kotha ~ kodha.
There is therefore a prima facie case for th ~ dh medially. Can those
who deny the distinction in medial position prove their assertion?
I should like to see them do so. Suspicions and doubts are not
enough. Proof please.
On 4 Feb 2009, at 15:53, Hewitt, Stephen wrote:
but I am certain that this is a serious linguistic question about
the phoneme inventory of Cornish from at least BM on.
Spellyans mailing list
Spellyans at kernowek.net
Dr. Jon Mills,
School of European Culture and Languages,
University of Kent
Be Yourself @ mail.com!
Choose From 200+ Email Addresses
Get a Free Account at www.mail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Spellyans