[Spellyans] gostoyth, gosteyth, gostyth
everson at evertype.com
Mon Feb 23 17:07:46 GMT 2009
I do not believe we have unstressed diphthongs. If it is unstressed,
it has to reduce in length.
<teyrgweyth> [ˈtɛɪrgwəθ] looks very wrong. Moreover, in KS, <ey>
is [əi] not [ɛɪ]. So this word looks very bad to me.
On 23 Feb 2009, at 14:36, Daniel Prohaska wrote:
> Meur ras dhis, Nicholas,
> I go with <gosteyth> and <gosteythter>. This seems most plausible to
> me. I have other instances in the dictionary where I give unstressed
> <ey> as [ə], such as <teyrgweyth> [ˈtɛɪrgwəθ] (SAMPA
> [“tEIrgw at T])., so this will be the form I will put in the
> dictionary. Maybe [ə] ought to be [ɪ] in both?
> From: nicholas williams
> Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2009 4:08 PM
> I am not sure.
> The word is <gustyth> twice in OM (lines 137 and 295).
> Tregear writes <gustith> at TH 12.
> It looks as though the word is < * wo-eks-têg-to or similar; in
> which case the second
> syllable would be -ey- in MC when stressed, i.e. gosteythter. On the
> other hand
> the unstressed -ith/-yth of gustith/gustyth would lead me to allow
> gostyth as the basic form
> Perhaps the simplest thing would be to write <gosteyth,
> gosteythter>. But gostyth cannot be considered wrong.
> What do you think, Dan?
> On 22 Feb 2009, at 12:36, Daniel Prohaska wrote:
> Nicholas, in the Bewnans Kespecific vocabulary section you give the
> reconstruction *gosteyth and in your dictionary the adjective
> gostyth and the noun gostythter with derived meanings. Should they
> begosteyth and gosteythter in the SWF?
> Spellyans mailing list
> Spellyans at kernowek.net
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com
More information about the Spellyans