[Spellyans] 'to do' in KS

nicholas williams njawilliams at gmail.com
Sat Jan 3 20:22:27 GMT 2009

I have changed my mind. I did revert to gul, and have subsequently  
started to write gwil.
Neither is wrong and gwil, though not attested, is as close to the  
attested form gwile as
KS prëv is to the attested form preve, or KS hav and gwâv are to the  
attested forms have and gwave.


On 3 Jan 2009, at 19:54, <ajtrim at msn.com> <ajtrim at msn.com> wrote:

> You did not say why.
> It just seemed to be an odd comment when you were clearly backing  
> <gwil>.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://kernowek.net/pipermail/spellyans_kernowek.net/attachments/20090103/b1aa92a7/attachment.html>

More information about the Spellyans mailing list