[Spellyans] kal revisited
everson at evertype.com
Sun Jan 4 16:08:12 GMT 2009
On 4 Jan 2009, at 15:51, Daniel Prohaska wrote:
> I’ve now spelt <kall, call>, because I think it contains a short
> vowel. I have mentioned reconstructed *kalgh as a possible older
> form in the entry, but not recommended it as a main entry. Is this
> feasible? How about the plural?
I would not mention the bretonization.
On balance I think this word would look better as <kàl>~<càl>. The -
all forms will tend to be pronounced as in English, I think. There are
words in <-al> that have a lowered pronunciation (long vowel) that
more or less rhymes with English <call>.
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com
More information about the Spellyans