[Spellyans] 'up, upwards'

Craig Weatherhill craig at agantavas.org
Thu Jan 22 19:32:43 GMT 2009


Will we then have: in bann, in badn, in mann (and presumably) in madn  
(even though I don't recall its attestation)?

Craig


On 22 Gen 2009, at 19:11, Michael Everson wrote:

> On 22 Jan 2009, at 18:34, nicholas williams wrote:
>
>> Why is in bann not to be pronounced in badn?
>
> Not sure I follow you. "in bann" may be pronounced as [ban] or  
> [badn], depending on dialect preference, and "in badn" may be  
> pronounced as [badn] or [ban].
>
>> It is clear that in ban without pre-occlusion was attested.
>
> Are you saying that in dialects that pre-occlude, "in bàn" also  
> occurs?
>
>>
>
> Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spellyans mailing list
> Spellyans at kernowek.net
> http://kernowek.net/mailman/listinfo/spellyans_kernowek.net

--
Craig Weatherhill





More information about the Spellyans mailing list