[Spellyans] 'up, upwards'

Christian Semmens christian.semmens at gmail.com
Sat Jan 24 18:52:37 GMT 2009

Although I understand there are some aesthetic sensibilities in RLC regading
the use of the letter 'i' but, so far I haven't seen much engagement from
the RLC community here with the exception of Mina and Neil. Is this so
important to them?

I must say, for my part, I tend to side with Eddie and Craig in this matter
and would prefer that, if we must use 'in' then, as Andrew suggests, 'yn' is
optional. I don't think there would be much likelyhood of there being
confusion between the adverbial particle and the preposition if both were
rendered 'yn'.


2009/1/24 Michael Everson <everson at evertype.com>

> On 23 Jan 2009, at 23:18, Craig Weatherhill wrote:
>  Although I run the risk of ruffling feathers, I do wonder if we are not
>> drifting off track with some of the items being discussed here.  Surely, the
>> idea was to concentrate upon addressing the faults recognised within SWF.  I
>> don't understand where the yn/in question comes into this.  Are we, in fact,
>> in danger of going a little too far?
> One of the faults is that it has no principled distribution if <i> and <y>
> except in stressed monosyllables and some finals. The other is that its
> accommodation of RLC cosmetic preferences isn't so great.
> Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com
> _______________________________________________
> Spellyans mailing list
> Spellyans at kernowek.net
> http://kernowek.net/mailman/listinfo/spellyans_kernowek.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://kernowek.net/pipermail/spellyans_kernowek.net/attachments/20090124/f6d0177d/attachment.html>

More information about the Spellyans mailing list