[Spellyans] kal revisited

Daniel Prohaska daniel at ryan-prohaska.com
Mon Jan 5 14:25:51 GMT 2009


This is for my SWF dictionary, so <càl> just isn’t an option.

Dan

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Everson
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2009 2:35 PM

 

On 5 Jan 2009, at 11:22, Daniel Prohaska wrote:

 

> The various dictionaries give <cal, -yow> (UCR), <kalgh, -yow> (KK),  

> <cal, caliaw> (RLC), so it seems there is a consensus for the plural  

> suffix to be <-yow> rather than <-ow>. SWF with a short vowel would  

> need to write <kall, kallyow> {call, callyow}.

 

"I will say again, I think that <call> will yield the wrong pronunciation.
<càl> pl <calyow> is preferable (and more authentic) for this word.

Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com"

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://kernowek.net/pipermail/spellyans_kernowek.net/attachments/20090105/f116f9c7/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Spellyans mailing list