njawilliams at gmail.com
Wed Mar 11 15:28:30 GMT 2009
We should allow both.
On 3/11/09, Michael Everson <everson at evertype.com> wrote:
> Yeah, but we have OM <lyf> and we have Lhuyd's <lyv>, so I would think that
> on balance were better off with <lyv> for this word.
> On 11 Mar 2009, at 14:29, Nicholas Williams wrote:
> > In a word, no. Lywe, lyw and lew appear to have a final [w]. So there
> > were probably two form lyw and lyv.
> Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com
> Spellyans mailing list
> Spellyans at kernowek.net
More information about the Spellyans