[Spellyans] Abbreviating Ordinal Numbers
eddie_climo at yahoo.co.uk
Wed Mar 25 22:54:35 GMT 2009
On 25 Mer 2009, at 16:05, Hewitt, Stephen wrote:
> "First,...next,...third,...fourth..." How natural! Jon Mills really
> ought to have thought of that!
Indeed. If Nicholas's stricture is correct, we should predict finding
an even spread of sequences like this in the historicical corpus:
kensa, nessa, tressa, peswara, pympes ...
kensa, secund, nessa, peswara, pympes ...
kensa, secund, tressa, nessa, pympes ...
kensa, secund, tressa, peswara, nessa ...
If, as I suspect, we only find the 1st of the above sequences, the
absence of the others would seem to invalidate the premise that
'nessa' only means 'next' and not 'second'.
As for the alleged 'spuriousness' of the 'Nancean' legacy, Nance was a
fine linguist and lexicographer. We are greatly indebted to him and to
the other revivalists of his generation. And if we are able to know
more about some areas of the Cornish language that they did, it's
largely thanks to our standing on their shoulders.
Eddie Foirbeis Climo
- -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- -
Dres ethom akennow byner re bons lyeshes
Accenti non multiplicandi praeter necessitatem
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Spellyans