[Spellyans] Abbreviating Ordinal Numbers
everson at evertype.com
Wed Mar 25 23:16:50 GMT 2009
On 25 Mar 2009, at 22:54, Eddie Climo wrote:
> If, as I suspect, we only find the 1st of the above sequences, the
> absence of the others would seem to invalidate the premise that
> 'nessa' only means 'next' and not 'second'.
Language (in this case semantic domain) is not constrained by that
kind of logical structure.
> As for the alleged 'spuriousness' of the 'Nancean' legacy, Nance was
> a fine linguist and lexicographer.
Yes, and he got some things wrong and there's not reason not to
recognize that and do better.
> We are greatly indebted to him and to the other revivalists of his
> generation. And if we are able to know more about some areas of the
> Cornish language that they did, it's largely thanks to our standing
> on their shoulders.
I'm sure this goes without saying.
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com
More information about the Spellyans