[Spellyans] An Abecedary Kernowek

ajtrim at msn.com ajtrim at msn.com
Mon Mar 30 01:18:53 IST 2009


OK, so it's M = èm and N = èn.

Why H = hâ rather than H = hê?

Someone mentioned Q = kuw.
I think that Q = cuw would be better, and I think cuw might be better than 
kyû (kyw?) or cû.
I don't dislike Q = cû though.

X = ex is OK with me.


Regards,

Andrew J. Trim



--------------------------------------------------
From: "Michael Everson" <everson at evertype.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 29, 2009 10:41 PM
To: "Standard Cornish discussion list" <spellyans at kernowek.net>
Subject: Re: [Spellyans] An Abecedary Kernowek

> On 29 Mar 2009, at 22:19, Craig Weatherhill wrote:
>
>> With M and N we would have to have two entries for each: one for the 
>> unpreoccluded form and one where preocclusion applies.
>
> Pre-occlusion could not apply to these words unless they were attested 
> with pre-occlusion.
>
> Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spellyans mailing list
> Spellyans at kernowek.net
> http://kernowek.net/mailman/listinfo/spellyans_kernowek.net
> 




More information about the Spellyans mailing list