[Spellyans] Dan's dissernya

Michael Everson everson at evertype.com
Tue May 26 20:39:35 BST 2009


I'm not sure what your point is. Perhaps my point was not clear. It is  
dis-cernya and con-cernya; it could not be consernya in KS as that  
would give [kᵿnˈzǝɹnjə] so it should be discernya not dissernya  
in the SWF.

On 26 May 2009, at 19:59, nicholas williams wrote:

> In the texts this word appears as:
>
> decernya x 1
> descernya x 2
> discernya x 1
> desernya x 1
> thesernya x 1
>
> Concernya is attested x 3 and consernya x 4
>
> Nicholas
>

Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/





More information about the Spellyans mailing list