[Spellyans] Dan's dissernya

nicholas williams njawilliams at gmail.com
Tue May 26 21:01:20 IST 2009


No, your point was not clear. It is slightly more so now.
I did not properly understand that you were talking about the SWF.
Isn't decernya the correct spelling in KS?

On 26 May 2009, at 20:39, Michael Everson wrote:

> I'm not sure what your point is. Perhaps my point was not clear. It  
> is dis-cernya and con-cernya; it could not be consernya in KS as  
> that would give [kᵿnˈzǝɹnjə] so it should be discernya not  
> dissernya in the SWF.
>
> On 26 May 2009, at 19:59, nicholas williams wrote:
>
>> In the texts this word appears as:
>>
>> decernya x 1
>> descernya x 2
>> discernya x 1
>> desernya x 1
>> thesernya x 1
>>
>> Concernya is attested x 3 and consernya x 4
>>
>> Nicholas
>>
>
> Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spellyans mailing list
> Spellyans at kernowek.net
> http://kernowek.net/mailman/listinfo/spellyans_kernowek.net

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://kernowek.net/pipermail/spellyans_kernowek.net/attachments/20090526/1e295dac/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Spellyans mailing list