[Spellyans] <o> and <au>

Craig Weatherhill weatherhill at freenet.co.uk
Sat Nov 7 07:44:42 GMT 2009

You're not to blame,Michael - that lies with the Cowethas rep.  (Now,  
I wonder who that was).


On 6 Du 2009, at 21:36, Michael Everson wrote:

> On 6 Nov 2009, at 20:43, Craig Weatherhill wrote:
>> One of the things I really can't accept about the SWF is its  
>> ridiculous refusal to differentiate between <o> and <au> (which KS  
>> does observe).
> Blame me. This was one of the things on our list that I didn't  
> remember to give to Trond before the AHG began. When I remembered  
> it, it was considered an "addition" from the dread me and Nicholas,  
> so one of the Cowethas reps saw fit to give it the thumbs-down.
> Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
> _______________________________________________
> Spellyans mailing list
> Spellyans at kernowek.net
> http://kernowek.net/mailman/listinfo/spellyans_kernowek.net

More information about the Spellyans mailing list