[Spellyans] <o> and <au>
weatherhill at freenet.co.uk
Sat Nov 7 07:44:42 GMT 2009
You're not to blame,Michael - that lies with the Cowethas rep. (Now,
I wonder who that was).
On 6 Du 2009, at 21:36, Michael Everson wrote:
> On 6 Nov 2009, at 20:43, Craig Weatherhill wrote:
>> One of the things I really can't accept about the SWF is its
>> ridiculous refusal to differentiate between <o> and <au> (which KS
>> does observe).
> Blame me. This was one of the things on our list that I didn't
> remember to give to Trond before the AHG began. When I remembered
> it, it was considered an "addition" from the dread me and Nicholas,
> so one of the Cowethas reps saw fit to give it the thumbs-down.
> Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
> Spellyans mailing list
> Spellyans at kernowek.net
More information about the Spellyans