[Spellyans] fleece

nicholas williams njawilliams at gmail.com
Thu Nov 26 11:27:15 GMT 2009


But if the reflex of <iw> is written <ew> and <eu>, then aspiring to  
distinguish <iw> and <yw/ew> is not merely aspirational, it's erroneous.

On 26 Du 2009, at 11:19, Michael Everson wrote:

> This is not relevant. The "justification" for them in the SWF is (1)  
> George has it in KK, (2) The Kesva and Cowethas members of the AHG  
> "aspire" (or said that they did) to distinguish <iw> and <yw> in  
> speech.





More information about the Spellyans mailing list