njawilliams at gmail.com
Thu Nov 26 13:01:29 GMT 2009
Byf, vyf are attested for the present subjunctive. Neither *beyf, nor
*bef occurs for this form, as far as I can see. It is not a bys/bes
word, I think.
Bef, vef is the first singular of the preterite: our beuv, beuma.
On 26 Du 2009, at 12:35, Michael Everson wrote:
> These forms need looking into; Jenner gives "bev (older byf, beyf)"
> so there is a possibility that this one *is* a classical bes/bys/
> beys word.
More information about the Spellyans