[Spellyans] fleece

j.mills at email.com j.mills at email.com
Thu Nov 26 14:08:49 GMT 2009


Why unlikely? In the manuscripts, <u> and <v> are in free variation. <u> and <w> are also in free variation. And <f> and <v> are also in free variation. Why then assume that <w> is only used to represent [u]?
Jon

_____________________________________ 
Dr. Jon Mills, 
School of European Culture and Languages, 
University of Kent



-----Original Message-----
From: nicholas williams <njawilliams at gmail.com>
To: Standard Cornish discussion list <spellyans at kernowek.net>
Sent: Thu, Nov 26, 2009 2:02 pm
Subject: Re: [Spellyans] fleece


In both CW lywe and TH lew? That seems unlikely.


On 26 Du 2009, at 13:58, j.mills at email.com wrote:


 I wonder whether the attested <-w> might not represent [v].
Jon



= 

_______________________________________________
pellyans mailing list
pellyans at kernowek.net
ttp://kernowek.net/mailman/listinfo/spellyans_kernowek.net

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://kernowek.net/pipermail/spellyans_kernowek.net/attachments/20091126/e1ecf4ce/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Spellyans mailing list