daniel at ryan-prohaska.com
Fri Nov 27 11:19:32 GMT 2009
Thanks for this!!
From: j.mills at email.com
Sent: Friday, November 27, 2009 12:10 PM
Lhuyd (1707: 33c,241c) uses a dotted-y in kẏligi. This represents schwa in a weak syllable. If we assume a singular form, kylik/colik, then the stress would shift to the first syllable and we need to know the strong form of the vowel in the first syllable. If this word comes form Latin cochylia, then it would be reasonable, perhaps, to assume the vowel <o>.
Dr. Jon Mills,
School of European Culture and Languages,
University of Kent
From: Daniel Prohaska <daniel at ryan-prohaska.com>
To: 'Standard Cornish discussion list' <spellyans at kernowek.net>
Sent: Fri, Nov 27, 2009 10:30 am
Subject: Re: [Spellyans] cockles
In a normalized orthography such as the SWF, would you say it’s fair to give kylik, kyligi (pl.), or would you go for something more “etymological” such as colik, coligy?
From: nicholas williams
Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2009 7:30 PM
Yes, AB: 33c. My error.
Doesn’t Lhuyd give kẏligi?
Spellyans mailing list
<mailto:Spellyans at kernowek.net> Spellyans at kernowek.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Spellyans