[Spellyans] An SWF glossary

Eddie Climo eddie_climo at yahoo.co.uk
Sun Jun 6 20:15:12 IST 2010


On 6 Efn 2010, at 19:07, Michael Everson wrote:
> It is misleading, and prejudicial against /T forms, for the glossary  
> to be presented the way that it is.

It might help improve the credibility and status of the /T forms of  
the SWF if more publishers were to support it, if only in parallel  
with any productions in their more favoured orthography.

If Authenticist publishers fail to provide such support, they can  
hardly complain if the /KK form of the SWF sweeps the board, so to  
speak.

Eddie Foirbeis Climo
- -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- -
Dres ethom akennow byner re bo lyeshes
Accenti non multiplicandi praeter necessitatem
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://kernowek.net/pipermail/spellyans_kernowek.net/attachments/20100606/51654670/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Spellyans mailing list