[Spellyans] KS specification document
eddie_climo at yahoo.co.uk
Thu May 6 07:12:03 BST 2010
Andrew and Craig,
I agree with what you say, and would like to add that, in addition to
the proposed list of SWF faults+remedies, we desperately need one more
... a draft specification of KS.
Without that, some of us (well, I don't imagine I'm the only one)
don't know all of what KS currently proposes. This makes it extremely
difficult to discuss KS.
For instance, I want to start a discussion of the diacritics currently
proposed in KS, and raise 2 questions:
1) does it have too many diacritics?
2) what should the status of diacritics be in KS: compulsory?
Without a KS specification to refer to, I can't initiate that thread.
I've requested this document before, but nothing has come of it.
Please, Michael and Nicholas, draft a KS spec document. Rough draft is
fine, no need for fine typesetting; just get it out asap.
More information about the Spellyans