[Spellyans] KS specification document

j.mills at email.com j.mills at email.com
Thu May 6 09:08:40 BST 2010

I would like to second this proposal. Could we have a specification of the current state of KS, please.
Ol an gwella,

Dr. Jon Mills, 
School of European Culture and Languages, 
University of Kent

-----Original Message-----
From: Eddie Climo <eddie_climo at yahoo.co.uk>
To: Standard Cornish discussion list <spellyans at kernowek.net>
Sent: Thu, May 6, 2010 7:12 am
Subject: [Spellyans] KS specification document

Andrew and Craig, 
I agree with what you say, and would like to add that, in addition to the proposed list of SWF faults+remedies, we desperately need one more thing: 
... a draft specification of KS. 
Without that, some of us (well, I don't imagine I'm the only one) don't know all of what KS currently proposes. This makes it extremely difficult to discuss KS. 
For instance, I want to start a discussion of the diacritics currently proposed in KS, and raise 2 questions: 
1) does it have too many diacritics? 
2) what should the status of diacritics be in KS: compulsory? recommended? optional? 
Without a KS specification to refer to, I can't initiate that thread. 
I've requested this document before, but nothing has come of it. Please, Michael and Nicholas, draft a KS spec document. Rough draft is fine, no need for fine typesetting; just get it out asap. 
Gromercy dheugh! 
Eddie Climo 
Spellyans mailing list 
Spellyans at kernowek.net 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://kernowek.net/pipermail/spellyans_kernowek.net/attachments/20100506/8be577f4/attachment.html>

More information about the Spellyans mailing list