owen.e.cook at gmail.com
Mon Nov 15 02:13:36 GMT 2010
And how interesting that BM has <u>... One might almost suggest
‘deugol’, to reflect the Middle and Late attestations.
On 14 November 2010 10:47, Michael Everson <everson at evertype.com> wrote:
> On 14 Nov 2010, at 16:32, nicholas williams wrote:
>> The attested forms of the word degol 'festival, saint's day' are:
>> dugol myhal 'Michaelmas' BM 2077
>> dugol myhall 'Michaelmas' BM 2201
>> Degl Stûl 'Epiphany' AB: 57a
>> Dedh goil and Degl 'holydays' AB: 59b.
>> Why then does the SWF write dy'gol and why is there an apostrophe?
> Clearly because of the "re-engineering" of Cornish which was done in the 1980s. "dy'" here represents "dydh".
> Since in the SWF one is free to use hyphens and apostrophes as one wishes, one might write dygol or dy gol.
> I prefer degol.
> Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
> Spellyans mailing list
> Spellyans at kernowek.net
More information about the Spellyans