craig at agantavas.org
Mon Nov 15 08:49:44 GMT 2010
I've always used: degol. Of course, when associated with a qualifier,
degol can just become a prefix, Gol- (Golperan, Golowan, etc., and
there's also the place name containing the word: Golant [gol + nans].
On 15 Du 2010, at 02:13, Owen Cook wrote:
> And how interesting that BM has <u>... One might almost suggest
> ‘deugol’, to reflect the Middle and Late attestations.
> On 14 November 2010 10:47, Michael Everson <everson at evertype.com>
>> On 14 Nov 2010, at 16:32, nicholas williams wrote:
>>> The attested forms of the word degol 'festival, saint's day' are:
>>> dugol myhal 'Michaelmas' BM 2077
>>> dugol myhall 'Michaelmas' BM 2201
>>> Degl Stûl 'Epiphany' AB: 57a
>>> Dedh goil and Degl 'holydays' AB: 59b.
>>> Why then does the SWF write dy'gol and why is there an apostrophe?
>> Clearly because of the "re-engineering" of Cornish which was done
>> in the 1980s. "dy'" here represents "dydh".
>> Since in the SWF one is free to use hyphens and apostrophes as one
>> wishes, one might write dygol or dy gol.
>> I prefer degol.
>> Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
>> Spellyans mailing list
>> Spellyans at kernowek.net
> Spellyans mailing list
> Spellyans at kernowek.net
More information about the Spellyans